November 12, 2008

Keith Olbermann's Prop 8 Comment "The Human Heart"



Finally tonight as promised, a Special Comment on the passage, last week, of Proposition Eight in California, which rescinded the right of same-sex couples to marry, and tilted the balance on this issue, from coast to coast.


Some parameters, as preface. This isn't about yelling, and this isn't about politics, and this isn't really just about Prop-8. And I don't have a personal investment in this: I'm not gay, I had to strain to think of one member of even my very extended family who is, I have no personal stories of close friends or colleagues fighting the prejudice that still pervades their lives.


And yet to me this vote is horrible. Horrible. Because this isn't about yelling, and this isn't about politics.

Story continues below

This is about the... human heart, and if that sounds corny, so be it.


If you voted for this Proposition or support those who did or the sentiment they expressed, I have some questions, because, truly, I do not... understand. Why does this matter to you? What is it to you? In a time of impermanence and fly-by-night relationships, these people over here want the same chance at permanence and happiness that is your option. They don't want to deny you yours. They don't want to take anything away from you. They want what you want -- a chance to be a little less alone in the world.


Only now you are saying to them -- no. You can't have it on these terms. Maybe something similar. If they behave. If they don't cause too much trouble. You'll even give them all the same legal rights -- even as you're taking away the legal right, which they already had. A world around them, still anchored in love and marriage, and you are saying, no, you can't marry.
What if somebody passed a law that said you couldn't marry?

I keep hearing this term "re-defining" marriage.


If this country hadn't re-defined marriage, black people still couldn't marry white people. Sixteen states had laws on the books which made that illegal... in 1967. 1967.


The parents of the President-Elect of the United States couldn't have married in nearly one third of the states of the country their son grew up to lead. But it's worse than that. If this country had not "re-defined" marriage, some black people still couldn't marry...black people. It is one of the most overlooked and cruelest parts of our sad story of slavery. Marriages were not legally recognized, if the people were slaves. Since slaves were property, they could not legally be husband and wife, or mother and child. Their marriage vows were different: not "Until Death, Do You Part," but "Until Death or Distance, Do You Part." Marriages among slaves were not legally recognized.


You know, just like marriages today in California are not legally recognized, if the people are... gay.


And uncountable in our history are the number of men and women, forced by society into marrying the opposite sex, in sham marriages, or marriages of convenience, or just marriages of not knowing -- centuries of men and women who have lived their lives in shame and unhappiness, and who have, through a lie to themselves or others, broken countless other lives, of spouses and children... All because we said a man couldn't marry another man, or a woman couldn't marry another woman. The sanctity of marriage.
How many marriages like that have there been and how on earth do they increase the "sanctity" of marriage rather than render the term, meaningless?

What is this, to you? Nobody is asking you to embrace their expression of love. But don't you, as human beings, have to embrace... that love? The world is barren enough.


It is stacked against love, and against hope, and against those very few and precious emotions that enable us to go forward. Your marriage only stands a 50-50 chance of lasting, no matter how much you feel and how hard you work.


And here are people overjoyed at the prospect of just that chance, and that work, just for the hope of having that feeling.
With so much hate in the world, with so much meaningless division, and people pitted against people for no good reason, this is what your religion tells you to do? With your experience of life and this world and all its sadnesses, this is what your conscience tells you to do?

With your knowledge that life, with endless vigor, seems to tilt the playing field on which we all live, in favor of unhappiness and hate... this is what your heart tells you to do? You want to sanctify marriage? You want to honor your God and the universal love you believe he represents? Then Spread happiness -- this tiny, symbolic, semantical grain of happiness -- share it with all those who seek it. Quote me anything from your religious leader or book of choice telling you to stand against this. And then tell me how you can believe both that statement and another statement, another one which reads only "do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
"

---

You are asked now, by your country, and perhaps by your creator, to stand on one side or another. You are asked now to stand, not on a question of politics, not on a question of religion, not on a question of gay or straight. You are asked now to stand, on a question of...love. All you need do is stand, and let the tiny ember of love meet its own fate. You don't have to help it, you don't have it applaud it, you don't have to fight for it. Just don't put it out. Just don't extinguish it. Because while it may at first look like that love is between two people you don't know and you don't understand and maybe you don't even want to know...It is, in fact, the ember of your love, for your fellow **person...

Just because this is the only world we have. And the other guy counts, too.


This is the second time in ten days I find myself concluding by turning to, of all things, the closing plea for mercy by Clarence Darrow in a murder trial.


But what he said, fits what is really at the heart of this:

"I was reading last night of the aspiration of the old Persian poet, Omar-Khayyam," he told the judge.


"It appealed to me as the highest that I can vision.
I wish it was in my heart, and I wish it was in the hearts of all:

"So I be written in the Book of Love;

"I do not care about that Book above.


"Erase my name, or write it as you will,

"So I be written in the Book of Love.
"

---
Good night, and good luck.

5 comments:

the dumb flyest. said...

I mean ... really, how I see it ... fuck what the gov't says in terms of marriage. It's a shame. It really is a piece of paper. You should be able to do what you do.

On the other hand, this country was built on Christian principles. There were slaves in the Bible ... and homosexuality wasn't allowed, persay (cuz I know there had to be some curious ppl back then, or w/e).

All in all, people should be allowed to just do what they do, if they're not hurting anyone. Why do people care so much about what other people do?

All-Mi-T [Thought Crime] Rawdawgbuffalo said...

that is one of the reasons i wrote my last post regarding hank paulson

and u write well, chk me out 1 day rawdawgbuffalo and if u like what u read, maybe u will come back, even Blog Roll Me

her. said...

Ugh... UGH. Girl... As late as I am reading this post, it made me smile. Me and a cousin of mine were just talking about this a while back. It was on the radio about the whole Wanda situation, and about people trying to pressure Queen Latifah into coming out at the VMA's.

Anyways, I love that someone who isn't homosexual wrote a blog surrounding this situation. It would be different if I wrote a blog on it, simpl because I'm a lesbian - that's what would be expected.

The whole situation is ridiculous, if you ask me. For them to even do that... is so beyond me. You would think by this point in time, people would get over themselves. Granted, they might not like the way we're living out our lives, but it is our lives. Not to mention, homosexuals work - and pay taxes, just like everybody else. We help keep this economy running, just as heterosexual people do. Not to mention, there isn't a single doubt in my mind that a good percentage of our gov't - our senate, our house, all that shit - has a good number of people who are living behind the walls.

It's pathetic, and it makes me sick to think that at this day, people are still so narrow-minded as to not be able to see that homosexuals are absolutely no different.

The last time I checked, love was love, regardless of who you're loving.

But, hey... I guess our opinions don't matter too much.

Swiss Replica Watches said...

We help keep this economy running, just as heterosexual people do. Not to mention, there isn't a single doubt in my mind that a good percentage of our gov't - our senate, our house, all that shit - has a good number of people who are living behind the walls.

Swiss Replica Watches said...

We help keep this economy running, just as heterosexual people do. Not to mention, there isn't a single doubt in my mind that a good percentage of our gov't - our senate, our house, all that shit - has a good number of people who are living behind the walls.